Home

News

Forums

Hardware

CPUs

Mainboards

Video

Guides

CPU Prices

Memory Prices

Shop



Sharky Extreme :


Latest News


- SanDisk's SSD As Rapid As It Is Reliable
- OCZ Launches Limited-Edition SSD
- AMD Offers Low-Profile DirectX 11 Graphics Card
- Microsoft Gaming Keyboard Has Awesome Anti-Ghosting
- Matrox Lets Multi-Monitor Fans Double Up
News Archives

Features

- SharkyExtreme.com: Interview with Microsoft's Dan Odell
- SharkyExtreme.com: Interview with ATI's Terry Makedon
- SharkyExtreme.com: Interview with Seagate's Joni Clark
- Half-Life 2 Review
- DOOM 3 Review

Buyer's Guides

- February High-end Gaming PC Buyer's Guide
- November Value Gaming PC Buyer's Guide
- September Extreme Gaming PC Buyer's Guide

HARDWARE

  • CPUs


  • Motherboards


  • Video Cards





  • We opted to set Quake III Test to run in "High-Quality" mode when performing this round of benchmarks, as we suspect most gamers that purchase 600MHz+ PCs equipped with GeForce256 and MAXX cards will do this as well. (No one spends $2,000+ on a PC to play their games in 16-bit color at 640x480 folks).

    The Creative SDR GeForce256 card catches up to the MAXX to some degree when the higher quality textures are used in Quake III Test, but the gap widens similarly to the previous Expendable scores as overall resolution is increased.

    Even though the MAXX is turning in a 40% better frame rate score than the Creative GeForce256 card in Quake III Test at 1600x1200x32, it's still not nearly enough to allow any serious gamers to call the experience playable. Instead 1024x768x32 seems to be the MAXX's sweet spot, as it recorded a Timdemo1 score of nearly 50fps.





    Copyright © 2002 INT Media Group, Incorporated. All Rights Reserved. About INT Media Group | Press Releases | Privacy Policy | Career Opportunities